不吐不快
i am feeling so damn freaking bored from studying!
OMG.
obsessive compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, eating disorder, piaget's theory on cognitive development, kohlberg's theory on moral development, erikson's theory on psychosocial development.
OHMYGOD i think i'm going to faint.
who the hell can remember all of this mann, who the hell.
zzz.
psychology test is finally over!
i think i fared average i guess, i mean, short term memory! what else can i say it's such a short topic.
but i think this way of assessment really helps learning, seriously:
the class was given 14 questions for the final test about 1month in advance.
and we were tasked to each do the questions, send to the class rep and then study the compiled answers.
on the asssessment day, ms tan would then draw lots to assign the questioner and the answerer.
the answerer would then ballot for a question to answer out of the 14.
when stuck, the questioner is supposed to prompt the answerer and guide him/her.
70% of the marks will be given based on how well each individual answered and 30% on how well each individual prompted the answerer and how supportive.
super nervous. but i think this form of assessment is beneficial for long term learning ((:
anyway, 有些事情，我真的不吐不快。
that's why i'm supposed to be studying SSM now but here i am blogging away.
i've been biting my tongue all the way to refrain from making any comments because i know it would be deemed as i'm siding O.
but then again, the way you and you phrased it is as though O is a complete freak whereas S is some nice person.
i was shocked that of all person, L said "O is a FREAK, S is still alright."
well, from my pov, it is the ultimate opposite.
at least O is frank with whatever O wants out of O's studies, and O admits that O is perfectionistic. O has never seen anyone else as a competition but O himself/herself. (trying to be ambiguous on O's gender.)
whereas for S, S sees everyone else as his/her (trying to be ambiguous about S's gender too) competition. bootlicks the teachers whenever S can. (very super obvious, even S's good friend, Y also admittedly say that S bootlicks and try to buy teachers' good books whenever S can.)
so why then, does everyone "dislike" O?
and says things like "O is a freak"?
just because O gets good grades in no matter what O does, be it projects or tests?
just because O excels in things that O do?
and of all people L because it's not like L's grades are poor exactly.
people have never seen the other side of O, like how much effort O puts in, in everything, never seen the depressed side of O when things screw up. (screw up but not to the extent of fail but just not up to O's expectations, but like i said, O already declared out loud O's a perfectionist. and O has very high over the top expectations on himself/herself.)
so what? is that illegal, to be a perfectionist? to have high expectations of oneself?
i don't think so.
as long as that person has the ability to reach that expected results, i don't see why not.
so Y said that it is unhealthy to be perfectionist and all, but yeah (all the psychology problems one might face if one is too perfectionistic), but i think if one strikes a balance to it, then what's the problem?
so to Y, one cannot be perfectionistic but one can bootlick and suck up to people, and look at everyone else as one's competitor, and that's fine? so-called healthy?
i mean, if that's what S chooses to do, it's alright, it's S's view on the way to survive in this society. so why can't being perfectionistic be O's view on the way to survive in this society too?
why must everyone attack O like nobody's business?
i find it very unfair to O, because people judge O only from one perspective.
and i also find it very unfair that i've heard so many blatant lies about O, while everyone only sees the "nice" side of S.
i mean i'm ok with S, we've been on pretty good talking terms and all before that and S was nice to me and all, but sometimes, certain things that S do i just disapprove and disagree.
but i still don't judge all of S from this one side and one perspective right?
i know i cannot stop all these tongue wagging but it just hit me when O has been nothing but nice, supportive, helpful and kind person to me. and to everyone else O's a freak or some i-dont-know-what.
so while you can argue that i don't know the other side of S well enough to make any judgement about S, you don't know the other side of O well enough to make any judgement about O too what.
and i know what THEIR problem is.
the privileges that ** teacher mentioned for the scholars.
get real. life isn't fair.
have you all seen the unfair treatment O got for a certain project presentation?
no.
so while some teachers choose to be subjective, there's nothing we can do about it what.
and if you feel unfair that scholars get privileges, den go sign up and be a scholar la!
i think they compensated the privileges with a lot of sacrifices they make, and the additional stress they face worrying about their grades and getting kicked out of the programme.
i know if Y knows about this entry, Y would say i overreacted, oversensitive and BLAH.
but WHATEVER.
PHEW
ok back to studying ssm!
OMG.
obsessive compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, eating disorder, piaget's theory on cognitive development, kohlberg's theory on moral development, erikson's theory on psychosocial development.
OHMYGOD i think i'm going to faint.
who the hell can remember all of this mann, who the hell.
zzz.
psychology test is finally over!
i think i fared average i guess, i mean, short term memory! what else can i say it's such a short topic.
but i think this way of assessment really helps learning, seriously:
the class was given 14 questions for the final test about 1month in advance.
and we were tasked to each do the questions, send to the class rep and then study the compiled answers.
on the asssessment day, ms tan would then draw lots to assign the questioner and the answerer.
the answerer would then ballot for a question to answer out of the 14.
when stuck, the questioner is supposed to prompt the answerer and guide him/her.
70% of the marks will be given based on how well each individual answered and 30% on how well each individual prompted the answerer and how supportive.
super nervous. but i think this form of assessment is beneficial for long term learning ((:
anyway, 有些事情，我真的不吐不快。
that's why i'm supposed to be studying SSM now but here i am blogging away.
i've been biting my tongue all the way to refrain from making any comments because i know it would be deemed as i'm siding O.
got distracted cuz my mum and the maid had to do some cooking and i had to play with pretty pretty boy.
but then again, the way you and you phrased it is as though O is a complete freak whereas S is some nice person.
i was shocked that of all person, L said "O is a FREAK, S is still alright."
well, from my pov, it is the ultimate opposite.
at least O is frank with whatever O wants out of O's studies, and O admits that O is perfectionistic. O has never seen anyone else as a competition but O himself/herself. (trying to be ambiguous on O's gender.)
whereas for S, S sees everyone else as his/her (trying to be ambiguous about S's gender too) competition. bootlicks the teachers whenever S can. (very super obvious, even S's good friend, Y also admittedly say that S bootlicks and try to buy teachers' good books whenever S can.)
so why then, does everyone "dislike" O?
and says things like "O is a freak"?
just because O gets good grades in no matter what O does, be it projects or tests?
just because O excels in things that O do?
and of all people L because it's not like L's grades are poor exactly.
people have never seen the other side of O, like how much effort O puts in, in everything, never seen the depressed side of O when things screw up. (screw up but not to the extent of fail but just not up to O's expectations, but like i said, O already declared out loud O's a perfectionist. and O has very high over the top expectations on himself/herself.)
so what? is that illegal, to be a perfectionist? to have high expectations of oneself?
i don't think so.
as long as that person has the ability to reach that expected results, i don't see why not.
so Y said that it is unhealthy to be perfectionist and all, but yeah (all the psychology problems one might face if one is too perfectionistic), but i think if one strikes a balance to it, then what's the problem?
so to Y, one cannot be perfectionistic but one can bootlick and suck up to people, and look at everyone else as one's competitor, and that's fine? so-called healthy?
i mean, if that's what S chooses to do, it's alright, it's S's view on the way to survive in this society. so why can't being perfectionistic be O's view on the way to survive in this society too?
why must everyone attack O like nobody's business?
i find it very unfair to O, because people judge O only from one perspective.
and i also find it very unfair that i've heard so many blatant lies about O, while everyone only sees the "nice" side of S.
i mean i'm ok with S, we've been on pretty good talking terms and all before that and S was nice to me and all, but sometimes, certain things that S do i just disapprove and disagree.
but i still don't judge all of S from this one side and one perspective right?
i know i cannot stop all these tongue wagging but it just hit me when O has been nothing but nice, supportive, helpful and kind person to me. and to everyone else O's a freak or some i-dont-know-what.
so while you can argue that i don't know the other side of S well enough to make any judgement about S, you don't know the other side of O well enough to make any judgement about O too what.
and i know what THEIR problem is.
the privileges that ** teacher mentioned for the scholars.
get real. life isn't fair.
have you all seen the unfair treatment O got for a certain project presentation?
no.
so while some teachers choose to be subjective, there's nothing we can do about it what.
and if you feel unfair that scholars get privileges, den go sign up and be a scholar la!
i think they compensated the privileges with a lot of sacrifices they make, and the additional stress they face worrying about their grades and getting kicked out of the programme.
i know if Y knows about this entry, Y would say i overreacted, oversensitive and BLAH.
but WHATEVER.
PHEW
ok back to studying ssm!
posted by carmen at
8:56 am
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home